Poverty focus a great media power year after year and year after year, 10 million people, mainly children, die of starvation at a rate of one per second
There are some concepts closely linked to the geopolitical, economic and social, with the passage of time and its structural permanence in our lives seem to have become an inherent part of historical cycles.
For over two decades about climate change as an abstract concept in the same way that the various non-governmental organizations take advantage of the interesting figure of corporate social responsibility to make major capital funds, tax-deductible funds to help the income statement , end after another of those eternal concepts through the history of world poverty.
Indeed, global poverty is part of the permanent collective subconscious, generation after generation lives, regardless of boom cycles or cycles of crisis, hunger in the world, sharing of resources and poverty.
Developed countries commit to “help” the poorest countries contemplating transfer of money policies while increasing the need to open the doors to new knowledge and technologies in developing countries to increase levels productivity in productive sectors.
No shortage of comparisons intended to awaken from their slumber to developed economies, comparisons that present generations can not be sized by the smallness of their life experiences, some certainly a concern as the number of children dying of hunger every year is equal the number of deaths caused by 50 bombs dropped on Hiroshima as, indeed terrible, but poverty and death are part of the reality of the world to the point of living with it without ya, not even, as a news .
But if there is something really unacceptable and morally despicable is that if it were not for the political and economic interests well known and, viewed from a strictly scientific perspective, end world hunger would not be so complex. Poverty is not related to a shortage of resources. According to a report in 2008 by FAO, the existing resources on the planet today would serve to sustain a world population ten times larger than today, while “developed” countries publicly funded the stoppage of food production.
